Back to Blog
Ampex 351 input transformer6/12/2023 ![]() In the unloaded case, there will be 7dB more feedback, thus flattening the response even more. It should be remembered that in the Ampex circuit, a fair amount of feedback is used, which will further flatten the frequency response in both cases. The frequency response isn't very good in either case, although the 600 ohm load flattens it out. ![]() The drop in mid-band level is due to the effect of the 600 ohm load with the 2 x 10K source impedance. The generator source impedance is 40 ohms, thus negligible. ![]() Looking at the 12AU7 data sheet, this gives an Rp of just about 10K, hence the 10K resistors driving the transformer. According to the Ampex 351 schematic, each half of the 12AU7 driving the transformer is drawing 6.5mA and has a plate-to-cathode voltage of about 275V. The second strike was John Atwood and I reeled that one in because he has a huge amount of knowledge / experience on the 351 and he not only had a sample of the transformer in question but the AP to measure it.SWEET!Īnd here is his commentary on the measurement method.Īttached is the result of my 351 line output transformer tests. ![]() To cut to the chase I cast out a line among my friends to try to score one and the first strike came from a tape friend with a carcass. It was insisted that loading the transformer improved the overall top end behavior considerably and I didn't buy it. Was in a discussion on another asylum about transformers and loading when this device came up and I was skeptical about the alleged behavior.
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |